Under-Capitalisation: Causes, Effects and Remedies

causes of over capitalisation

The measure, however, is directed towards the rebuildingof the resource only. Consequently, it is virtually certain that the stock of“conventional” capital will be built up to a level far in excess ofthe optimal level. The excess will lead to economic waste, and can be expectedto stand as a threat to the resource investment programme.

Adverse Effects of Overcapitalization on Company, Society, and Shareholders

But when boom conditions cease prices of products decline resulting in lower earnings. The original value of assets remains in books while earning capacity dwindles due to depression. The term “overcapitalization” refers to a situation wherein the value of a company’s capital is worth more than its total assets.

Thus, we canconclude, without hesitation or fear of contradiction, that, as far as capacitycontrol is concerned, the TACs-only policy is an unmitigated disaster. As well as predicting that excess capacity will lead to fulldissipation of resource rent from the fishery, one can also predict thefollowing. The rent dissipation will cause the industry dependent upon thefishery to be vulnerable to adverse resource and economic shocks. Hence, it canbe anticipated that, periodically, pressure will be imposed upon government toprovide subsidies to relieve the economic distress.

causes of over capitalisation

As the names suggest, time and area closures, prohibit fishingat specified times and in specified areas. These measures can producesignificant benefits for the resource, but, once again, there is little or noevidence that they have significant benefits in terms of control of capacity(OECD, ibid.). In significantly overexploited fisheries for which thecontrol of capacity is being achieved through other means, ancillary measuresmay nevertheless play a key role in adjusting stock size to higherlevels. The second objection isthat control through the use of taxes is politically unacceptable. Hence taxes, as ameans of control in fisheries, constitute a theoretical plaything for academiceconomists.

Liberal Dividend Policy

  1. In more general terms, many limited entry programmes were actuallyinitiated against a policy framework of intensive subsidization for vesselconstruction and improvement.
  2. (ii) Fair rate of return means the prevailing rate of return; which other companies in the industry- doing similar business are paying.
  3. Instead of $1,000,000, Company ABC decides to use $1,200,000 as its capital.
  4. Further, the excess capacitycan be expected to serve as a threat to efforts to conserve the resource.
  5. “When a company has consistently   been unable to earn the prevailing rate of return on its outstanding securities (considering the earnings of similar companies in the same industry and the degree of risk), it is to be over-capitalised.
  6. In more general terms, the management of capacity would alsorequire a certain departure from the way fishing is monitored, with a fargreater emphasis being put on monitoring fleet characteristics and on assessingtheir dynamics.

11 Financial is a registered investment adviser located in Lufkin, Texas. 11 Financial may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. 11 Financial’s website is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its advisory services, together with access to additional investment-related information, publications, and links. In almost all cases, corporate reorganization is the best solution for an overcapitalized company.

Naturally, there is a considerable decline in the rate of equity dividend after having paid interest on debentures, income- tax and preference dividend. Over-capitalisation is that state of financial affairs of a company, in which the real value of company’s assets is much less than their book value; leading to a permanent decline in the earning capacity of the company. By its nature, inflationary conditions are an important factor in over capitalisation of business enterprises, and equally affect both the newly promoted as well as the established companies. During boom period, companies have to pay high prices for purchases of causes of over capitalisation fixed assets, and the amount of capitalisation is kept high. Higher capitalisation is justifiable until inflationary conditions prevail.

Put simply, there is more debt and equity compared to the value of its assets. Outside of supporting attempts to gain access to newfisheries, the governments supporting DWFN fleets would, in light of the severeadjustment problems that they were confronting with these fleets, be understrong pressure to cushion the blow through subsidies. The Milazzo study does,for example, observe that the main effect of the Japanese subsidy programme,which is substantial, has been to cause the decline in the Japanese fishingfleet to be less precipitous than would otherwise have been the case. The question of subsidies was raised very briefly under theheading of the economics of overcapitalization.

the management of fishing capacity

  1. The state owned company was originally set up as a meansof enhancing Mauritania’s marketing power in the export markets and toprevent transfer pricing by joint ventures.
  2. One approach to measuring excess capacity in a regulated open accesssituation is in terms of cost.
  3. Combining thesefacts with the fact that the ITQs are now normally expressed as percentages ofthe TAC, the ITQs are beginning, more and more, to take on the characteristicsof corporate shares.
  4. The third approach, used when the licenses are transferable,is to surround the conditions of transfer and sale with regulations which willensure that capacity is reduced following the transfer.
  5. If the “conventional” capital isnon-malleable, why would any investor acquire such capital, given that he(she)knows that the resource is likely to be subject to “overexploitation”,and driven down to some level like x¥?
  6. Over-capitalisation arises when the existing capital of a firm is not effectively utilised with the result that there is a fall in the earning capacity of the company.

It wasannounced that Can.$80 million had been set aside to purchase vessels, andlicenses, and to retire them from the fishery. Following this, a moratorium is then declared on the issuance offurther new licenses. We follow the TACs-only policy with license limitationschemes, because these schemes are seldom used alone, but are normally combinedwith other measures, commonly TACs. Indeed one can go further, and predict that the amount of“conventional” capital in the fishery will end up by being greaterthan it was when the TAC was first implemented (Clark, 1985). The evidencepresented by the OECD is overwhelming in its support of thesepredictions.

open access fisheries

This makes the management of capacity a rathercomplex endeavour which would require assessments at both CMU level (actual anddesired capacity) and fishery level (actual and desired effort). Statistical and complementary analyses of fleet and stockinteractions would allow for a segmentation of the industry in several CMUs. Thecontours of any CMU should reflect not only the prevailing allocation pattern,but also the range of possible short-term reallocation. Possible reallocation ofcapacity among fisheries may refer to space in terms of alternative fishingareas or to target species/stocks in terms of gear and related harvestingtechnology. The range of possibilities would be determined by the practical andtechnical difficulty of transferring existing capacity among fisheries, as wellas by related cost.

Just like overcapitalization, being undercapitalized is not where any company wants to be. In passing, we should also observe that the measurement ofcapacity utilisation for major industries is taken very seriously. Themeasurements for such industries are used, for example, as one of the indicatorsof the state of the economy (Morrison, 1985).

causes of over capitalisation

Overcapitalization vs. Undercapitalization

It may be noted that over-capitalisation does not necessarily mean abundance or excess of capital. Company may be over-capitalised because its capital is not effectively utilised, thus causing a constant decline in earnings. This leads to the inability of the company to pay normal rate of dividend and interest on shares and debentures respectively, and the .consequent fall in the market value of its shares. If theargument is valid (and it is appealing intuitively), then this suggests that wemay have discovered a new and powerful motivation underlying the subsidyprogrammes that exacerbate the world overcapitalization problem.

When Canada implemented Extended Fisheries Jurisdiction (EFJ)in 1977, 95 percent of the Northern Cod resource became subject to Canadiancontrol and management. Canadatook the view that the resource had been seriously overexploited prior to EFJ.Hence a resource investment programme was called for, which was expected toextend over a ten year period In 1977, there did not exist a Canadian directedoffshore Northern Cod fishery. The directed offshore fishery was all butexclusively a distant water fishing nation one. Canada was able to bring aboutthe required reduction in fishing effort largely by evicting (over time) theDWFN fleets from its EEZ (Gordon and Munro, 1996). From the Canadianperspective, the DWFN fleet capital was highly malleable. Canada did not,with respect to this fishery, have a serious capacity problem.